Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Articles
DOI: 10.14254/1795-6889.2026.22-1.5
Submitted: 2025-11-28
Published: 2026-04-29

Technologically mediated sociomaterial arrangements shaping everyday ageing

Satakunta University of Applied Sciences
Satakunta University of Applied Sciences, RoboAI Research Center, Pori, Finland
Satakunta University of Applied Sciences, RoboAI Research Center, Pori, Finland
School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, UK
Medication safety and research, Pharmaceutical Society of Australia, Australia
Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Finland
Satakunta University of Applied Sciences, RoboAI Research Center, Pori, Finland
Actor-Network Theory technology ageing everyday life sociomateriality

Abstract

This study explores how agency in later life is enacted within everyday sociomaterial arrangements. Drawing on Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), the analysis is based on open-ended survey responses from older adults and healthcare professionals. The findings suggest that people, objects, spaces, and temporal rhythms collectively shape the conditions under which agency becomes enabled or constrained in daily life. Rather than framing challenges as individual deficits, the study highlights how agency emerges through the alignment, or misalignment, of diverse human and non-human elements. Agency is found to be fragile, dynamic, and context-dependent, shaped by bodily rhythms, spatial accessibility, technological mediation, and temporal coordination. Suggestions from professionals are interpreted as proposed interventions into these everyday sociomaterial arrangements. By integrating ANT and ICF, the study offers a relational understanding of functioning that challenges individualistic models and contributes to critical ageing research by showing how agency in later life can be examined as a situated and sociomaterial achievement.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
  2. Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J., & Vargo, S. (2015). Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 135–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39:1.03
  3. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–233). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
  4. Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology (pp. 277–303). Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  5. Duff, C. (2010). On the role of affect and practice in the production of place. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(5), 881–895. https://doi.org/10.1068/d16209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d16209
  6. Ertner, S. M. (2022). Infrastructuring ageing: Theorizing non-human agency in ageing and technology studies. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 15(2), Article 3556. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3556
  7. Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-Network Theory in Education (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203849088
  8. Gangopadhyay, J. (2025). Later-life care and ageing practices: An international landscape. Society, 62(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-025-01097-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-025-01097-6
  9. Greenhough, T., & Stones, R. (2010). Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. Social Science & Medicine, 70(9), 1285–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.034
  10. Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2010). Aging without agency: Theorizing the fourth age. Aging & Mental Health, 14(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860903228762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860903228762
  11. Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
  12. Huhtasalo, J. (2019). Opettajan asiantuntijuus muutoksessa – asiantuntijuus ja sen jakamisen diskurssit digitaalisessa oppimisympäristössä. Kasvatus & Aika, 13(4), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.33350/ka.79620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33350/ka.79620
  13. Huhtasalo, J. (2022). Asiantuntijuus, digitaalinen teknologia ja moniaineksiset toimijaverkostot. [Doctoral dissertation, Tampere University]. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/136086
  14. Huhtasalo, J., Blomberg, A., & Kallio, K-M. (2021). Digitaalisen opetusteknologian vaikutukset opettajien asiantuntijuuteen ja ammatti-identiteettiin yliopistoissa. Yliopistopedagogiikka, 2/2021.
  15. Hyysalo, S. (2016). Health technology development and use: From practice-bound imagination to evolving impacts. Routledge.
  16. Jenkins, N. D., Hoogendijk, E. O., Armstrong, J. J., Lewis, N. A., Ranson, J. M., Rijnhart, J. J. M., Ahmed, T., Ghachem, A., Mullin, D. S., Ntanasi, E., Welstead, M., Auais, M., Bennett, D. A., Bandinelli, S., Cesari, M., Ferrucci, L., French, S. D., Huisman, M., Llewellyn, D. J., Scarmeas, N. & Muniz-Terrera, G. (2022). Trajectories of Frailty With Aging: Coordinated Analysis of Five Longitudinal Studies. Innovation in aging, 6(2), igab059. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab059
  17. Joyce, K., & Mamo, L. (2006). Graying the cyborg: New directions in feminist analyses of aging, science, and technology. In T. Calasanti & K. Slevin (Eds.), Age matters: Re-aligning feminist thinking (pp. 99–121). Routledge.
  18. Karhinen, J. (2020). Digital technologies in elderly care: ANT perspectives on co-production and agency (Master's thesis, University of Helsinki).
  19. Katz, S. (2018). Ageing in context: Reconsidering its contemporary social, cultural and political meanings. In L. Ayalon & C. Tesch-Römer (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on ageing and the life course (pp. 27–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_3
  20. Kuoppamäki, S., Hänninen, R., & Taipale, S. (2022). Enhancing older adults’ digital inclusion through social support: A qualitative interview study. In Vulnerable people and digital inclusion (pp. 211–230). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94122-2_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94122-2_11
  21. Latikka, R., Rubio-Hernández, R., Lohan, E. S., Rantala, J., Nieto Fernández, F., Laitinen, A., & Oksanen, A. (2021). Older adults' loneliness, social isolation, and physical information and communication technology in the era of ambient assisted living: A systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), e28022. https://doi.org/10.2196/28022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/28022
  22. Latour, B. (1999a). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 264–280). Blackwell Publishers.
  23. Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or the Love of Technology (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1992)
  24. Latour, B. (1999b). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), Sociology of monsters (pp. 103–131). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03350.x
  25. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
  26. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
  27. Lehtonen, M. (2008). Sosiomateriaalinen ajattelu toimijaverkostoteoriassa. Tiedepolitiikka, 33(1), 22–32.
  28. Manchester, H., & Jarke, J. (2022). Considering the role of material gerontology in reimagining technology design for ageing populations. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 15(2), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3531
  29. Marshall, B. L., & Katz, S. (2016). How old am I? Digital culture and quantified ageing. Digital Culture & Society, 2(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0110
  30. Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge.
  31. Neven, L. (2010). 'But obviously not for me': Robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01218.x
  32. Neves, B. B., & Mead, G. (2021). Digital technology and older people: Towards a sociological approach to technology adoption in later life. Sociology, 55(5), 888–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520975587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520975587
  33. Nguyen, Q. D., Moodie, E. M., Forget, M.-F., Desmarais, P., Keezer, M. R., & Wolfson, C. (2021). Health heterogeneity in older adults: Exploration in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 69(3), 678–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16919
  34. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
  35. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211644
  36. Outila, M., & Kiuru, H. (2020). “Picturephone in my home”: Actor-network theory and Foucauldian discourse analysis on Northern Finnish older adults starting to use a video conferencing service. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 39(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2020.1869670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2020.1869670
  37. Parviainen, J. (2020). Technology and agency in elderly care: An actor-network perspective. Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, 6, 1–12.
  38. Parviainen, J. (2021). Digital transformations in elder care: Reassembling care networks. Nordic Journal of Social Research, 12(1), 45–59.
  39. Peine, A., & Neven, L. (2020). From intervention to co-constitution: New directions in theorizing about aging and technology. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny050
  40. Peine, A., & Neven, L. (2021). The co-constitution of ageing and technology: A model and agenda. Ageing & Society, 41(12), 2845–2866. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X2000064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20000641
  41. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Eleventh edition. Wolters Kluwer.
  42. Pols, J. (2012). Care at a distance: On the closeness of technology. Amsterdam University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_413032
  43. Pyyhtinen, O. (2010). Sosiologinen teoria: Klassikoista nykykeskusteluihin. Gaudeamus.
  44. Teittinen, A. (2008). Verkostot, toimijuus ja valta. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 73(5), 473–485.
  45. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748–759. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0318
  46. Turjamaa, R., Pehkonen, A., & Kangasniemi, M. (2019). How smart homes are used to support older people: An integrative review. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 14(4), Article e12260. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12260
  47. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). WHO.

How to Cite

Huhtasalo, J., Jyräkoski, T., Leino, M., Tchuenbou-Magaia, F. T.-M., Morrissey, H., Virkki, J., & Merilampi, S. (2026). Technologically mediated sociomaterial arrangements shaping everyday ageing. Human Technology, 22(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-6889.2026.22-1.5